Home > IV Online magazine > 2020 > IV549 - October 2020 > Next steps for Black Lives Matter movement, elections and beyond


Next steps for Black Lives Matter movement, elections and beyond

Friday 23 October 2020, by Malik Miah

Save this article in PDF Version imprimable de cet article Version imprimable

“I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those that do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the systems of exploitation.?

‒ Malcolm X, from an interview in the final weeks of his life, 1965.

President Donald Trump has thrown his support behind white nationalists and supremacists. His anti-Black racism and anti-democratic views are on display every day. He sees the extremists as an important part of his base.

After the recent vice-presidential debate, Trump called Democratic candidate Kamala Harris ‒ the first Black and Asian woman of a major party to seek the vice presidency ‒ a “monster”, “communist” and “unlikeable”.

Despite contracting COVID-19 in early October (although it is not clear exactly when or how), Trump spreads misinformation about the disease and pretends it is no big deal. He tweeted, “Don’t be afraid of COVID” and don’t let it “dominate” your life. Meanwhile, more than 216,000 Americans have died — the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in a single country.
Michigan governor stands strong

In April, Trump tweeted “Liberate Michigan”, targeting the Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who was seeking strong anti-virus protections in the state. Trump especially disrespects strong women.

Whitmer refuses to buckle to Trump and his extremist base. She has called him out repeatedly.

On October 8, the FBI, Michigan State police and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced the arrest of 13 white supremacists for allegedly planning to kidnap and possibly murder Whitmer.

Six of the men face federal charges for conspiracy to kidnap the governor. The other seven are charged with domestic terrorism under state law.

Detroit Free Press said that “According to an FBI affidavit, individuals connected with a militia group purchased items, including a Taser and night goggles, conducted surveillance at Whitmer’s cottage, and discussed blowing up a bridge to divert police, kidnapping Whitmer, and taking her to Wisconsin to face a ‘trial’ for treason.”

Whitmer had known about the kidnapping plot for several weeks and had received many online threats against her.

The seven men arrested under state law are allegedly members of the “Wolverine Watchmen” — a Michigan-based militia that has been recruiting members on Facebook since November.

Their goal was to bring together as many people as possible to prepare for a so-called “boogaloo” — a violent uprising against the government or civil war.

Trump’s complicity

Whitmer accused Trump of being "complicit" because of his rhetoric and attacks against her.

In Kenosha, Wisconsin, when Kyle Rittenhouse, an armed teenage thug, travelled from Illinois and murdered two peaceful protesters, Trump hailed him as employing “self-defence”.

Michigan has a long history of white supremacist organisations and violence. Although privately-armed militias are not protected under the Constitution, they have been free to flourish across the country.

Many militia members have ties to the police, who look the other way.

The plot to kidnap Whitmer was not a surprise. However, Trump’s Attorney General, William Barr, continues to deny any knowledge of threats against elected officials.

The Southern Poverty Law Center estimates there are 175 white supremacist groups across the country. Those groups are the violent threats, not Blacks or Muslims. The FBI director agrees.

“Greater good” or “lesser evil”?

What does the Michigan plot mean for the presidential election? Should the left fall behind the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris presidential ticket to stop Trump? Will voting out Trump end Trumpism?

The anti-Trump forces see the Michigan plot as more reason to mobilise votes for Biden. Liberals urge those in the streets in the Black lives uprising as well as union battles and defenders of women and LGBTI rights to do the same.

This is no surprise. The Democratic Party establishment has moved to stop the Green Party from getting on state ballots. This is the Democrats own version of voter suppression, sending a clear message to “never Trump” Republicans that Biden is no socialist or radical.

The liberal strategy is to vote for Biden as “the greater good”. Trump is a far rightist, but is within Republican Party orthodoxy regarding policy. He is using the institutions of the state to protect and expand his financial empire. Those loyal to him are so for their own financial interest or political objectives.

Trump targets immigrants, Blacks (always the case) and other people of colour. Working-class whites ‒ the real “victims” in Trump’s rhetoric ‒ have always been highly influenced by anti-Black racism, to avoid being treated as inferior.

On the left, support for Biden includes some who believe he is a “greater good” candidate. But most understand that systemic racism is rooted in capitalism and support Biden as a way to roll back Trump’s attacks on “democracy”.

This approach is called “lesser evilism”. Trump is so bad that some call him a “neo-fascist”. The socialist left, therefore, must be with the anti-Trump forces, even if it means electing a capitalist politician who will continue to support the police and the state against them.

The error is to join with the liberals who are organising against Trump by mobilising the vote for the Democrats. Lesser evilism has never brought significant change or fundamental change.

There is no mass socialist party or political movement in the US right now. The most significant mass uprising is the Black-led anti-cop movement. While most of these militants will vote for Biden, rather than third-party candidates in their states, they recognise that whoever wins will not change the police violence and murder of unarmed Black men and women.

Police terror was a prominent feature during the Barack Obama-Biden presidency. Obama showed empathy to the Black victims while he proposed no serious changes to the criminal legal system.

People’s Tribunal

The leaders of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement take a long-term view of the struggle, which includes voting rights. To that end they are organising a two-day live-streamed event on October 17–18, The Freedom Side: The People’s Tribunal and Congress. The theme of the event is: “Rising against white supremacist terror, toward a just world.”

“In the tradition of international tribunals against state terror, we the people will hold corrupt government officials, greedy corporations, and actors of white supremacist and patriarchal violence accountable for the terror our communities face.

“The Tribunal will lay the crimes of US policy and the policies and practices of dominant institutions that perpetuate white supremacy, state terror, racial capitalism, empire and hetero patriarchy.

“The biggest uprising in US history has focused on police violence and racism, but the demands of the movement reflect a bigger agenda and a deeper analysis. This tribunal will document in human terms, the pain and suffering caused by current policies and practices.”

The event will feature “Freedom Side Jurors” including Angela Davis, Alfred Woodfox, Raquel Willis, Tom Goldtooth and Arundhati Roy, and will receive testimonies from communities across the country on the first day.

The second day will be the “People’s Congress”.

“We are a resilient community. Despite the conditions we face, we continue to envision a just world where we live with dignity and integrity.”

The People’s Congress will also outline a strategic plan beyond November: “We will be building our collective vision that goes beyond the elections and building our skills to take sustained action towards liberation.”
Defeating Trumpism

It won’t be possible to defeat Trumpism and the unfair criminal justice system by electing liberal officials and maintaining a legal system that justifies the police killing of Black people.

The strategy must include counter mobilisations against these reactionary forces.

When armed militias occupied the Michigan State Capitol building, the response was denunciations, legislation and legal briefs. Black legislators and others were afraid to walk to their offices. The police did nothing.

Since the arrests over the plot to kidnap the state’s governor, the Republicans are downplaying its significance. They also oppose a ban on bringing firearms into the building.

Liberals like Whitmer have expressed concern about the street protests against the police and she rejects using public demonstrations to fight back.

But, imagine if mobilisations ‒ like the BLM peaceful protests ‒ had countered the armed, white demonstrations against Whitmer’s actions to protect citizens from COVID-19?

African Americans, especially, know that the institutions of the state have not valued their lives or interests as full human beings.

Malcolm X once explained the difference between white conservatives and liberals. “Beware of both,” he said.

“The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them.

“But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the ‘smiling’ fox.

“One is a wolf, the other is a fox. No matter what, they’ll both eat you.”

Presidents, even liberal ones like Democrat “New Deal” Franklin Roosevelt in the 1930s, only appealed to whites, as his voting base included the segregated anti-Black South.

In the 1960s, Democrats and Republicans pressured the civil rights leaders to “slow down” on the movement’s demands. Martin Luther King jnr and the militant left wing said, “No”. Finally, Democratic President Lyndon Johnson decided that the new Black voters could replace the racist whites in the South.

Yet, the now more inclusive Democratic Party joined with the Republicans (now aligned with former segregationist Democrats in the South) to oppose moves to desegregate public schools. This included then-Senator Biden.

Affirmative action programs first set up by Johnson were opposed later by Democrats and Republicans.

The dozens of new Black elected officials have little influence or real political power.

Strategy of counter-mobilisation

The bottom line is that mass struggle brought about changes, including the integration of the military in the 1940s and the civil rights laws in the 1960s.

The task for revolutionary socialists, who are small in number, is to present a clear anti-capitalist perspective.

The independent socialist strategy is simple: counter-mobilise against the right and join with the people in the struggles for Black lives, labour rights, women’s rights and LGBTI rights, and present an electoral platform that points to a socialist future.

Young people are being politicised and radicalised by the peaceful protests and debates between anti-Trump and pro-Trump forces.

The police clashes with peaceful marchers, and armed militias like those in Michigan, show the future could be more chaotic and violent.

Advancing revolutionary socialist vision and leadership is extremely important in this environment.

13 October 2020

Source Green Left Weekly.


If you like this article or have found it useful, please consider donating towards the work of International Viewpoint. Simply follow this link: Donate then enter an amount of your choice. One-off donations are very welcome. But regular donations by standing order are also vital to our continuing functioning. See the last paragraph of this article for our bank account details and take out a standing order. Thanks.