Home > IV Online magazine > 2019 > IV531 - April 2019 > On the Deir Yassin Massacre Anniversary


On the Deir Yassin Massacre Anniversary

Monday 8 April 2019, by David Finkel

Save this article in PDF Version imprimable de cet article Version imprimable

The Israeli election on April 9, 2019 will coincide with the anniversary of the massacre of the Arab village of Deir Yassin, a turning point in the mass flight of Palestinians during the 1948 war (the Nakba, or catastrophe). According to establishment historiography, this massacre was carried out by the extreme rightwing Irgun militia — the military arm of the party that gave rise to today’s governing Likud — but the truth is more complicated to say the least.

The village of Deir Yassin was defended lightly, if at all, and had no record of insurgency. That’s why it was chosen for the Irgun’s attack:

Deir Yassin resounded throughout the land, indeed throughout the world, and with the desired effect. Even a record of friendship for the Jews was no protection, no insurance. It was after this that the Arab flight became general.

This quote is from a lengthy article by Hal Draper, Israel’s Arab Minority: The Beginning of a Tragedy. The entire piece is worth reading, among other reasons because it shows how much information was actually available, from strictly Zionist and mainstream sources, more than six decades ago. Sections 7 through 11 of the essay deal specifically with the Deir Yassin, the story behind the massacre, and its consequences. [1]

As Draper writes:

The official Zionist army, Haganah, repudiated the massacre, undoubtedly sincerely, but also went on to claim that the Irgun had attacked Deir Yassin without any military justification and without the agreement of the official forces. The Irgun countered by releasing the exact text of the letter from the regional Haganah commander agreeing to the attack (not to a massacre, of course)…but [Deir Yassin] was supposed to be assaulted and invested as a military operation, in cynical violation of any non-aggression obligation to it.

So there was direct “official-Zionist” complicity. During the attack itself, “among the obscure relations is undoubtedly the role of the other official-Zionist armed force, the Palmach,” which was close by and provided covering fire to assist wounded Irgunists.

It is not easy to see what, according to the official story, the Palmach was doing there in the first place. So it is not quite true that the Deir Yassin massacre was simply the uncontrollable act of mavericks for whom the official Zionists were not responsible, as it is represented by all good Zionist writers who duly express their horror at it.

Subsequently, far from a rupture between the “official” Haganah and “maverick” Irgun, relations became closer. As for the Haganah and official Zionist leadership, “It was not Arab-exterminationism which moved them to break with the terrorists; it was the assassination five months later of the UN mediator, Count Bernadotte” (a murder carried out by an extreme Zionist-terrorist faction called “Sternists”).

This is one revealing fragment of the Nakba story. Read it and weep.

Against the Current


If you like this article or have found it useful, please consider donating towards the work of International Viewpoint. Simply follow this link: Donate then enter an amount of your choice. One-off donations are very welcome. But regular donations by standing order are also vital to our continuing functioning. See the last paragraph of this article for our bank account details and take out a standing order. Thanks.